The impact of funding models on the integration of Ontario midwives: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 30 years post legalisation and introduction, midwifery is still not optimally integrated within the health system of Canada's largest province, Ontario. Funding models have been identified as one of the main barriers. METHODS: Using a constructivist perspective, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study to examine how antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum funding arrangements in Ontario impact midwifery integration. We conceptualized optimal 'integration' as circumstances in which midwives' knowledge, skills, and model of care are broadly respected and fully utilized, interprofessional collaboration and referral support the best possible care for patients, and midwives feel a sense of belonging within hospitals and the greater health system. We collected data through semi-structured telephone interviews with midwives, obstetricians, family physicians, and nurses. The data was examined using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 participants, including 5 obstetricians, 5 family physicians, 5 midwives, 4 nurses, and 1 policy expert. We found that while course-of-care-based midwifery funding is perceived to support high levels of midwifery client satisfaction and excellent clinical outcomes, it lacks flexibility. This limits opportunities for interprofessional collaboration and for midwives to use their knowledge and skills to respond to health system gaps. The physician fee-for-service funding model creates competition for births, has unintended consequences that limit midwives' scope and access to hospital privileges, and fails to appropriately compensate physician consultants, particularly as midwifery volumes grow. Siloing of midwifery funding from hospital funding further restricts innovative contributions from midwives to respond to community healthcare needs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant policy changes, such as adequate remuneration for consultants, possibly including salary-based physician funding; flexibility to compensate midwives for care beyond the existing course of care model; and a clearly articulated health human resource plan for sexual and reproductive care are needed to improve midwifery integration.

Qual família e qual comunidade? Reconfigurações da Medicina de Família e Comunidade na saúde suplementar / ¿Qué familia y qué comunidad? Reconfiguraciones de la Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria en salud complementaria / Which family and which community? Reconfigurations of Family and Community Medicine in supplementary health

RESUMO: Trata-se de um estudo cartográfico que buscou analisar a atuação de médicos(as) de família e comunidade na Atenção Primária da saúde suplementar, realizado por meio de diários e entrevistas cartográficas entre março de 2021 e janeiro de 2022, processados semanalmente em reuniões de pesquisa. Tal estudo se deu com base nos analisadores: 'território', 'família' e 'comunidade'. Notou-se que a territorialização e a abordagem familiar ganham outros contornos na Medicina de Família e Comunidade praticada na saúde suplementar. Além disso, verificou-se que algumas das ferramentas típicas da Atenção Básica - como visita domiciliar, educação em saúde, genograma, ecomapa e vigilância em saúde - não eram utilizadas na atenção suplementar ou tiveram outras aplicabilidades dissonantes do modelo preconizado. Concluiu-se que a Medicina de Família e Comunidade na saúde suplementar se aproxima de uma atuação mais clínica, com perda da potência das linhas de força que constituem tal especialidade, tendendo a uma medicina menos familiar e comunitária.

RESUMEN: Se trata de un estudio cartográfico que buscó analizar el desempeño de los médicos de familia y comunidad en atención primaria de salud complementaria, realizado a través de diarios y entrevistas cartográficas entre marzo de 2021 y enero de 2022, que fueron procesados semanalmente en reuniones de investigación. Este estudio se basó en los analizadores: 'territorio', 'familia' y 'comunidad'. Se observó que la territorialización y el enfoque familiar adquieren otros contornos en la Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria practicada en salud complementaria. Además, se encontró que algunas de las herramientas típicas de la atención básica, como las visitas domiciliarias, la educación sanitaria, el genograma, el ecomap y la vigilancia sanitaria, no se utilizaron en la atención complementaria o tenían otra aplicabilidad disonante del modelo recomendado. Se concluyó que la Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria en salud complementaria se aproxima a una práctica más clínica, con pérdida de potencia de las líneas eléctricas que constituyen dicha especialidad, tendiendo a una medicina menos familiar y comunitaria.

ABSTRACT: This is a cartographic study that sought to analyze the performance of family and community physicians in primary care of supplementary health, carried out through diaries and cartographic interviews between March 2021 and January 2022, which were weekly processed in research meetings. This study was based on the analyzers: 'territory', 'family' and 'community'. It was noticed that territorialization and family approach gain other contours in Family and Community Medicine practiced in supplementary health. In addition, it was found that some of the typical tools of basic care - such as home visits, health education, genogram, ecomap and health surveillance - were not used in supplementary care or had other dissonant applicabilities of the recommended model. It was concluded that Family and Community Medicine in supplementary health approaches a more clinical practice, with loss of power from the power lines that constitute such specialty, tending to a less familiar and community medicine.

Sarcoidosis: An FP's primer on an enigmatic disease.

Management includes ruling out alternate diagnoses, identifying occult/overt organ involvement, determining treatment, and recognizing worrisome features.

COVID-19 disruption: Family physicians at the forefront.

No abstract available.

The evolving role of family physicians during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis: An appreciative reflection.

Ten family physicians and family medicine registrars in a South African semi-rural training complex reflected on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis during their quarterly training complex meeting. The crisis has become the disruptor that is placing pressure on the traditional roles of the family physician. The importance of preventative and promotive care in a community-oriented approach, being a capacity builder and leading the health team as a consultant have assumed new meanings.

Impact of family physician integrated care program on decreasing utilization of emergency department visit and hospital admission: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hospital admission and emergency department(ED) visits are a massive burden in medical expenditures. In 2003, the Taiwanese government developed Family Physician Integrated Care Program (FPIC) to increase the quality of primary care and decrease medical expenditures. This study's goals were to determine whether FPIC decreased hospital admissions and ED visits and identify the factors influencing the outcomes. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted for the period between 2006 and 2013 by using data obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 68,218 individuals were divided into those who joined FPIC and those who did not. We used propensity score matching at a ratio of 1:1 and logistic regression with the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model having a difference-in-difference design to investigate the effects of the FPIC policy on hospital admissions and ED visits in 7 years. RESULTS: Using logistic regression with the GEE model with the difference-in-difference design, we found no reduction in ED visits and hospital admissions between the two groups. The participants' risk of hospital admissions increased in the first year after joining FPIC (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20, P < .05). However, participants who joined FPIC showed an 8% lower risk of hospital admissions in the sixth and seventh years after joining FPIC, compared with those who did not join FPIC (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-1.00, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: FPIC in Taiwan could not decrease medical utilization initially but might reduce hospital admissions in the long term.

New Research on Back Pain, Diet and Diabetes, Advanced Care Planning, and Other Issues Frequently Seen in Family Medicine.

From the United States and Netherlands, we have 2 articles on back pain, with findings that indicate significant treatment differences between the countries, and a high likelihood of persistence. The Inflammatory Diet is now shown to be related to diabetes. Multiple perspectives on palliative care for the homeless. Could pharmacists assist in preventing suicide? There are changes in the practice of family medicine. Social determinants of health substantially influence health and medical care. Moreover, care for patients from deprived communities is under-reimbursed. Patient pre-existing conditions increased after the Affordable Care Act, suggesting that repealing pre-existing condition protections would likely exacerbate disparities in health and health care.

The Declining Presence of Family Physicians in Hospital-Based Care.

Despite training to provide care across the continuum of health delivery settings, the proportion of family physicians (FPs) reporting inpatient care has decreased by 26% between 2013 and 2017, leaving approximately 1 in 4 of FPs practicing hospital medicine in 2017. Policy makers, payers, and leaders in medical education should closely track the impact of these trends, given previous evidence associating better cost and utilization outcomes with broader scope of practice.

Facilitators and barriers to implement the family doctor contracting services in China: findings from a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the facilitators and barriers to implement family doctor contracting services in China by using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to shed new light on establishing family doctor systems in developing countries. DESIGN: A qualitative study conducted from June to August 2017 using semistructured interview guides for focus group discussions (FGDs) and individual interviews. CFIR was used to guide data coding, data analysis and reporting of findings. SETTING: 19 primary health institutions in nine provinces purposively selected from the eastern, middle and western areas of China. PARTICIPANTS: From the nine sampled provinces in China, 62 policy makers from health related departments at the province, city and county/district levels participated in 9 FGDs; 19 leaders of primary health institutions participated in individual interviews; and 48 family doctor team members participated in 15 FGDs. RESULTS: Based on CFIR constructs, notable facilitators included national reform involving both top-down and bottom-up policy making (Intervention); support from essential public health funds, fiscal subsidies and health insurance (Outer setting); extra performance-based payments for family doctor teams based on evaluation (Inner setting); and positive engagement of health administrators (Process). Notable barriers included a lack of essential matching mechanisms at national level (Intervention); distrust in the quality of primary care, a lack of government subsidies and health insurance reimbursement and performance ceiling policy (Outer setting); the low competency of family doctors and weak influence of evaluations on performance-based salary (Inner setting); and misunderstandings about family doctor contracting services (Process). CONCLUSIONS: The national design with essential features including financing, incentive mechanisms and multidepartment cooperation, was vital for implementing family doctor contracting services in China. More attention should be paid to the quality of primary care and competency of family doctors. All stakeholders must be informed, be involved and participate before and during the process.

Kampala Commitment 2019.

No abstract available.

Creation of the Primary Health Care Secretariat and its implications for SUS. / Criação da Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde e suas implicações para o SUS.

On May 20, 2019, one day after the world's celebration of the Family Physician's Day, the Ministry of Health published Decree N. 9,795 of May 17, 2019, which changed the organization chart of this federal body. For the first time in the country's history, a specific Secretariat responsible for Primary Health Care and the Family Health Strategy (ESF) was created. The ESF celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2019. The new Primary Health Care Secretariat (SAPS) has three departments: the already existing Department of Strategic Programmatic Actions (DAPES), a Department of Family Health (DESF) and a new Department of Health Promotion (DPS). The Secretariat has, among its competencies, commitments that seek to meet structural challenges, even in the face of a budget constraint scenario that has been observed since 2014. Among the commitments are: (i) increasing the population's access to family health units , (ii) definition of a new funding model based on health and efficiency results, (iii) definition of a new model for the provision and training of physicians for remote areas, (iv) strengthening of clinic and teamwork, v) expansion of the computerization of units and electronic medical records.

Em 20 de maio de 2019, um dia após a celebração mundial do "Dia do Médico de Família", o Ministério da Saúde publicou o Decreto nº 9.795, de 17 de maio de 2019, que alterou o organograma desse órgão federal. Foi criada, pela primeira vez na história do País, uma Secretaria específica responsável pela Atenção Primária à Saúde e pela Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF), que completou 25 anos em 2019. A nova Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde (SAPS) abriga três departamentos: o já existente Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas (DAPES), um Departamento de Saúde da Família (DESF) e um novo Departamento de Promoção da Saúde (DPS). A Secretaria apresenta entre suas competências, compromissos que buscam enfrentar desafios de ordem estruturante, mesmo diante de um cenário de restrição orçamentária que vem sendo observado desde 2014. Entre os compromissos colocados estão: (i) ampliação do acesso da população às unidades de saúde da família, (ii) definição de um novo modelo de financiamento baseado em resultados em saúde e eficiência, (iii) definição de um novo modelo de provimento e formação de médicos para áreas remotas, (iv) fortalecimento da clínica e do trabalho em equipe, (v) ampliação da informatização das unidades e prontuário eletrônico.

Criação da Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde e suas implicações para o SUS / Creation of the Primary Health Care Secretariat and its implications for SUS

Resumo Em 20 de maio de 2019, um dia após a celebração mundial do "Dia do Médico de Família", o Ministério da Saúde publicou o Decreto nº 9.795, de 17 de maio de 2019, que alterou o organograma desse órgão federal. Foi criada, pela primeira vez na história do País, uma Secretaria específica responsável pela Atenção Primária à Saúde e pela Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF), que completou 25 anos em 2019. A nova Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde (SAPS) abriga três departamentos: o já existente Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas (DAPES), um Departamento de Saúde da Família (DESF) e um novo Departamento de Promoção da Saúde (DPS). A Secretaria apresenta entre suas competências, compromissos que buscam enfrentar desafios de ordem estruturante, mesmo diante de um cenário de restrição orçamentária que vem sendo observado desde 2014. Entre os compromissos colocados estão: (i) ampliação do acesso da população às unidades de saúde da família, (ii) definição de um novo modelo de financiamento baseado em resultados em saúde e eficiência, (iii) definição de um novo modelo de provimento e formação de médicos para áreas remotas, (iv) fortalecimento da clínica e do trabalho em equipe, (v) ampliação da informatização das unidades e prontuário eletrônico.

Abstract On May 20, 2019, one day after the world's celebration of the Family Physician's Day, the Ministry of Health published Decree N. 9,795 of May 17, 2019, which changed the organization chart of this federal body. For the first time in the country's history, a specific Secretariat responsible for Primary Health Care and the Family Health Strategy (ESF) was created. The ESF celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2019. The new Primary Health Care Secretariat (SAPS) has three departments: the already existing Department of Strategic Programmatic Actions (DAPES), a Department of Family Health (DESF) and a new Department of Health Promotion (DPS). The Secretariat has, among its competencies, commitments that seek to meet structural challenges, even in the face of a budget constraint scenario that has been observed since 2014. Among the commitments are: (i) increasing the population's access to family health units , (ii) definition of a new funding model based on health and efficiency results, (iii) definition of a new model for the provision and training of physicians for remote areas, (iv) strengthening of clinic and teamwork, v) expansion of the computerization of units and electronic medical records.

The effect of family doctor-contracted services on noncommunicable disease self-management in Shanghai, China.

BACKGROUND: Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are a major threat to population health worldwide. In Shanghai, China, a new pattern of NCD management-self-management-has been developed in community health service centres (CHSCs). OBJECTIVE: To clarify how contracting with CHSC-based family doctors (FDs) influences the engagement in and effectiveness of self-management behaviour among NCD patients. METHOD: We conducted two waves of a questionnaire survey (in 2013 and 2016) to collect data on patients with NCDs. Separate logistic regression models and longitudinal analysis were performed to examine the effect of contracting with an FD on NCD self-management and the effectiveness of this self-management. RESULTS: Nearly all contracted patients (80.79%) had implemented NCD self-management, while only 55.57% of non-contracted patients did so. The self-management effectiveness rate was also higher among contracted patients than among non-contracted ones (86.66% vs. 54.79%). In the population-averaged models, contracted patients had 2.25 and 2.91 times greater odds of implementing self-management and reporting that the self-management was effective, respectively, after controlling for all related variables. Additionally, awareness of FD-contracted services, satisfaction with CHSCs, and experiencing first contact at CHSCs had positive impacts on the implementation and effectiveness of self-management. CONCLUSIONS: FDs were important for ensuring that NCD patients engaged in self-management behaviour, the most common form of which was focus group. Participation in NCD focus groups may be key for attaining the effects of self-management, including improved health knowledge, greater health awareness, more frequent engagement in health behaviour, and, most importantly, greater practice of self-monitoring. Self-management might help to achieve greater NCD control.

How the health institution combinative contracting mechanism influences community residents' patient experiences in Shanghai: A comparative study of data from two cross-sectional surveys.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the effect of the health institution combinative contracting mechanism (which make participating residents make a "combinative contracting" involving family doctor of community health center, one secondary hospital, and one tertiary hospital) on community residents' patient experiences in Shanghai, China. METHODS: We conducted two questionnaire surveys (2016 and 2018) on the patient experiences of 1200 permanent residents of 12 subdistricts of Shanghai, who were selected via stratified random sampling. Of these, 926 participants were included after propensity score matching. We compared five dimensions of patient experience-accessibility, environment and facilities, service attitude and emotional support, communication and patient engagement, and service integration-before and after implementation of the health institution combinative contracting mechanism in June 2016. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors related to residents' overall experience. RESULTS: The health institution combinative contracting mechanism influenced most dimensions of residents' patient experience, such as accessibility, service attitude and emotional support, communication and patient participation, and service integration. The mechanism in general helped contracted residents obtain a better patient experience than before its implementation. Referral had a significant effect on participants' overall experience. CONCLUSION: Contracted family doctors play active roles in improving nearly every dimension of residents' service experience, as well as their overall experience of services. The health institution combinative contracting mechanism not only increases interaction and strengthens trust between doctors and patients but also makes it possible for residents to obtain integrated health services.

Factors influencing residents' decision to sign with family doctors under the new health care reform in China.

BACKGROUND: As an important means through which to promote Chinese health care reform, the family doctor policy has attracted attention from various fields. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing residents' decision to sign with family doctors, with a view to informing the changes necessary to encourage additional residents to do so, thereby enhancing the efficacy of primary health care system reform. METHODS: The residents of five communities in Xianning, Hubei Province, were selected, by convenience sampling, to participate in the study. We developed and administered a questionnaire to collect data, from which we obtained 725 valid response sets. Socio-demographic characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics; and Pearson chi-squared test and binary logistic regression were performed to identify the factors influencing residents' decision to sign with family doctors. RESULTS: We found that the factors influencing residents' decision to sign include their education level, medical insurance, chronic diseases, medical treatment habits, awareness of the family doctor policy, perception of the medical skills of family doctors, and attitudes towards family doctors' signing services (P < .05). CONCLUSION: To encourage more residents to sign with family doctors, we recommend the implementation of the following: increasing publicity for the family doctor policy, promoting the reasonable distribution of high-quality resources, augmenting the standard of general medical education, and improving the skills and competencies of family doctors.